Endorsement replacing exclusion l. effectively deleting subcontractor work exception did not apply to flooding damage insured general contractor held liable for because flooding related damage to plaintiff’s “residence resulted from exposure to overdeveloped wetlands adjacent to it—a problem created by neither [insured] nor its subcontractors.” Jessco, Inc. v. Builders Mut. Ins. Co., No. 2:08-1759-PMD (D. S.C. Jan 29, 2010)(Duffy)
Must Read
Mississippi “occurrence”
Caselaw, Insuring Agreement, Mississippi, Occurrence | March 23, 2010