Because the underlying complaint did not allege that the insured’s faulty workmanship did not damage anything other than the insured’s work, it did not allege an “occurrence.” Ladd v. Arbella Protection Ins. Co., No. 23-P-1427, 105 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (Mass. Ct. App. 2/25/2025). The opinion is unpublished which means it is persuasive but not binding.
“Occurrence” In Massachusetts Requires Damage to Other Property
